Built to survive your review.
Nothing leaves the perimeter.
Funded workstreams, stated as such.
We publish what is in progress; milestone dates are shared under NDA. Silence would read as absence.
SOC 2 Type II
ISO/IEC 27001
VAPT attestation
What each regime asks of AI decisioning — and how GroundSet is designed to support it.
BSP IT Risk Management
What it requires of AI decisioning
- A board-approved IT risk management framework covering systems that support credit and operational decisions.
- Oversight of third-party and outsourced technology, including where customer data is processed.
- Information security controls, access management and audit trails for critical systems.
How GroundSet is designed to support it
- Runs inside the bank's own VPC — no customer data is processed on vendor infrastructure.
- Every decision is recorded with its evidence, rule version, outcome and any human override.
- Rules are versioned objects the bank's own governance approves; the ledger shows which version decided what.
IMDA Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI (Jan 2026)
MAS FEAT principles (fairness, ethics, accountability, transparency) inform the same design.
What it requires of AI decisioning
- Verifiable identity and accountability for every agent action.
- An audit trail of who acted, under whose authorisation, on what basis.
- Human oversight at defined checkpoints, proportionate to risk.
How GroundSet is designed to support it
- Each decision is attributed to a rule version and the policy owner who authorised it.
- Escalations route to named human roles; their overrides are set in the same record.
- Any decision can be replayed end-to-end for a supervisor or auditor.
India DPDP
What it requires of AI decisioning
- Processing of personal data only for a specified, lawful purpose.
- Reasonable security safeguards and breach notification.
- Erasure once the purpose is served, and accountability for processors.
How GroundSet is designed to support it
- Processing stays inside the data fiduciary's environment; GroundSet does not receive the data.
- Documents are handled in-memory and purged — zero retention by architecture.
- Decision records stay inside your perimeter, under your retention policy.
SR 26-2
What it requires of AI decisioning
- Board-level governance of AI decisioning that sits outside model-risk guidance.
- Documented, reviewable decision processes and ongoing monitoring.
How GroundSet is designed to support it
- Deterministic rules: the same input produces the same output, so behaviour is testable before and after change.
- An immutable ledger of every judgement gives the board and examiners the record the guidance expects.
EU AI Act
What it requires of AI decisioning
- For high-risk uses such as creditworthiness and insurance risk assessment: automatic logging of system events.
- Transparency to deployers, and effective human oversight.
- Accuracy, robustness and a documented risk-management system.
How GroundSet is designed to support it
- Logging is the product: evidence, rule version, outcome and override are recorded for every decision.
- Human review is a first-class route, with the reviewer and their reasoning set in the record.
- Deterministic policy execution makes each outcome explainable against the rule that produced it.
GroundSet is designed to support compliance with the frameworks above. Compliance is determined by each institution and its supervisor; nothing on this page is legal advice.
Found something? Tell us first.
Report vulnerabilities to security@groundset.tech. We acknowledge within one business day.
Available on request.
Our DPA and the security annex are shared with institutions in evaluation. Ask for them with your walkthrough.
Walkthrough with security annexSee one real workflow become infrastructure.
We map one decision workflow from your operation and show it running end-to-end — understood, decided, routed, and set in the ledger. Thirty minutes, your data patterns, no slideware.